The Lonely — Story, Setting & Ideas
Edition facts
The Lonely — Story, Setting & Ideas can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 6,991 words, 31 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 20.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Science fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ILLUSTRATED BY LUTJENS
[Transcriber's Note: This etext was produced from Worlds of Tomorrow October 1963 Extensive research did not uncover any evidence that the U.S. copyright on this publication was renewed.]
If we practice our "Space Speech" and listen real hard--Is this the sort of thing we're going to hear?
TO: The Hon. Natarajan Roi Hennessy, Chairman, Committee on Intercultural Relations, Solar Council, Eros.
FROM: Dr. Shlomo Mouna, Sr. Anthropologist, Project Ozma XII, Pluto Station.
TRANSMISSION: VIA: Tight beam, scrambled. SENT: 1306 hrs, TST. RCVD: 1947 hrs, TST
Herewith, a much condensed, heavily annotated, and topsecret coded transcript of a program we just picked up. The official title is GU#79, and the content pretty well confirms some of our earlier assumptions about the whole series, as this one concerns us directly, and we have enough background information, including specific dates, to get a much more complete and stylistic translation than before.
I'd say the hypotheses that these messages represent a "Galactic University" lecture series broadcast from somewhere near Galactic Center, through some medium a damn sight faster than light, now seems very reasonable.
This one seemed to come from Altair, which would date transmission from there only a few years after some incidents described in script. Some of the material also indicates probable nature of original format, and I find it uncomfortable. Also reraises question of whether Altair, Arcturus, Castor, etc., relay stations are aimed at us? Although the content makes that doubtful.
Full transcript, film, etc. will go out through channels, as soon as you let me know which channels. This time I am not pleading for declassification. I think of some Spaserve reactions and--frankly I wonder if it shouldn't be limited to SC Intercult Chairmen and Ozma Sr. Anthropoids--and sometimes I wonder about thee.
TRANSCRIPT, GU#79, Condensed Version, edited by SM, 10/9/92, TC. (NRH: All material in parens is in my words--summarizing, commenting, and/or describing visual material where indicated. Straight text is verbatim, though cut as indicated. Times, measurements, etc., have been translated from Standard Galactic or Aldebaran local to Terran Standard; and bear in mind that words like "perceive" are often very rough translations for SG concepts more inclusive than our language provides for.--SM)
(Open with distance shot of Spaserve crew visiting Woman of Earth statue on Aldebaran VI. Closeup of reverent faces. Shots of old L-1, still in orbit, and jump-ship trailing it. Repeats first shot, then to Lecturer. You may have seen this one before. Sort of electric eel type. Actually makes sparks when he's being funny.)
The image you have just perceived is symbolic, in several senses. First, the statue was created by the Arlemites, the native race of Aldebaran VI (!! Yes, Virginia, there _are_ aborigines!!) in an effort to use emotional symbols to bridge the gap in communications between two highly dissimilar species. Second: due to the farcical failure of this original intent, the structure has now become a vitally significant symbol--you perceived the impact--to the other species involved, the Terrans, a newly emerged race from Sol III. (Note that "you perceived." We must accept the implication that the original broadcasting format provides means of projecting emotional content.) Finally, this two-fold symbol relates in one sense (Shooting sparks like mad here. Professional humor pretty much the same all over, hey?) to the phenomenon of the paradox of absolute universality and infinite variety inherent in the symbolism.
(Next section is a sort of refresher-review of earlier lectures. Subject of the whole course appears to be, roughly, "Problems of disparate symbolism in interspecies communications." This lecture--don't laugh--is "Symbols of Sexuality." Excerpts from review:--)
The phenomenon of symbolism is an integral part of the development of communicating intelligence. Distinctions of biological construction, ecological situation, atmospheric and other geophysical conditions, do of course profoundly influence the racially infantile phases of intellectual-emotional-social development in all cultures ... (but) ... from approximately that point in the linear development of a civilization at which it is likely to make contact with other cultures--that is, from the commencement of cultural maturity, following the typically adolescent outburst of energy in which first contact is generally accomplished ... (He describes this level at some length in terms of a complex of: 1, astrophysical knowledge; 2, control of basic matter-energy conversions, "mechanical or psial;" 3, self-awareness of whole culture and of individuals in it; and 4, some sociological phenomena for which I have no referents.) ... all cultures appear to progress through a known sequence of i-e-s patterns ... (and) ... despite differences in the _rate_ of development, the composite i-e-s curve for mature cultural development of all known species is identical enough to permit reliable predictions for any civilization, once located on the curve.
(Then progresses to symbolism. Specific symbols, he says, vary even more, between cultures, than language or other means of conscious communication, as to wit--)
Judith Merril's 'The Lonely' unfolds as a classified memo from Dr. Shlomo Mouna to a Solar Council chairman, enclosing a transcript of a Galactic University lecture. The framing device immediately establishes a tension between official secrecy and the desire to share unsettling knowledge. Mouna's annotations—marked by parentheses, italics, and personal asides—blur the line between objective report and subjective reaction, inviting readers to question the reliability of both the transcript and the anthropologist's own interpretations.
Framing the Unknowable
The story's epistolary structure does more than convey information; it dramatizes the difficulty of cross-species communication. Mouna's cover letter is peppered with qualifiers: 'much condensed, heavily annotated, and topsecret coded.' He admits to 'stylistic translation' and notes that words like 'perceive' are 'rough translations for SG concepts more inclusive than our language provides for.' This self-consciousness about language underscores a central theme: human categories may be inadequate for understanding alien minds. The lecturer, described as an 'electric eel type' that 'makes sparks when he's being funny,' is simultaneously familiar and utterly foreign, a reminder that even humor may not translate.
The Statue as Emotional Weapon
The Arlemites, unable to communicate with 'psi-negatives whose primary perceptions were aural and visual,' construct a statue of the Woman of Earth as a warning. Yet the statue's meaning is profoundly ambiguous. Mouna's own reaction, presented as a free-form meditation, oscillates between reverence and unease: 'warm and ... untouchable? ... rather, untouched.' He notes that male crew members respond with sarcasm ('Old White Goddess, whaddya know?'), while female staff focus on 'phallic rather than female component.' The statue, intended to convey fear and hate, instead evokes a complex mix of longing, awe, and mockery. This mismatch between intention and reception highlights the perils of assuming shared symbolism.
The Child's Defiant Act
The lecture's climax recounts a child who, after watching the last adult die, breaks the 'most inviolable of rules' and steps into near-airlessness. Her death is swift, but her brain yields the knowledge that allows the Arlemites to understand humans. Merril presents this as both tragedy and breakthrough: the child's rebellion is 'the last act of rebelliousness that mitigated the futility of the tragedy.' The Arlemites then 'generated an organism to decompose the Terrans and their artifacts,' erasing all traces of the failed colony. This chilling efficiency—studying, then cleansing—raises questions about the ethics of knowledge gained from suffering, and whether the Arlemites' 'sorrow' is genuine or merely a translation artifact.
Readers should attend to the gaps in the transcript: Mouna's editorial cuts, his parenthetical summaries, and the moments where his own voice intrudes. The story never resolves whether the Arlemites are benevolent or manipulative, nor whether the Galactic University lectures are aimed at humanity. Instead, it offers a meditation on the limits of empathy and the dangers of assuming that a shared symbol—like a statue of a woman—carries a single meaning across species and cultures.
That report reminded me how often we misread each other’s silences, and how much weight we place on objects that were never meant for us. It sat beside a quieter thought about With These Hands — Context and Discussion, which lingers on similar gestures gone wrong. I keep returning to both, like checking an old photograph for a face I missed the first time.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.